Solid-state esophageal pressure sensor for the estimation of pleural pressure: a bench and first-in-human validation study

Ventilation Practitoner Nico Goedendorp schreef als mede auteur mee aan dit artikel.

Background

Advanced respiratory monitoring through the measurement of esophageal pressure (Pes) as a surrogate of pleural pressure helps guiding mechanical ventilation in ICU patients. Pes measurement with an esophageal balloon catheter, the current clinical reference standard, needs complex calibrations and a multitude of factors influence its reliability. Solid-state pressure sensors might be able to overcome these limitations.

Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy of a new solid-state Pes transducer (Pessolid). We hypothesized that measurements are non-inferior to those obtained with a properly calibrated balloon catheter (Pesbal).

Methods

Absolute and relative solid-state sensor Pes measurements were compared to a reference pressure in a 5-day bench setup, and to simultaneously placed balloon catheters in 15 spontaneously breathing healthy volunteers and in 16 mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Bland–Altman analysis was performed using mixed effects modelling with bootstrapping to estimate bias and upper and lower limits of agreement (LoA) and their confidence intervals.

Results

Bench study: Solid-state pressure transducers had a positive bias (Psolid – Pref) of around 1 cmH2O for the absolute minimal and maximum pressures, and no bias for pressure swings. Healthy volunteers: the solid-state transducer revealed a bias (i.e., Pessolid – Pesbal) [upper LoA; lower LoA] of 1.59 [8.21; − 5.02], − 2.32 [4.27; − 8.92] and 3.91 [11.04; − 3.23] cmH2O for end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and ΔPes values, respectively. ICU patients: the solid-state transducer showed a bias (Pessolid–Pesbal) [upper LoA; lower LoA] during controlled/assisted ventilation of: − 0.15 [1.41; − 1.72]/− 0.19 [5.23; − 5.62], 0.32 [3.45; − 2.82]/− 0.54 [4.81; − 5.90] and 0.47 [3.90; − 2.96]/0.35 [4.01; − 3.31] cmH2O for end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and ΔPes values, respectively. LoA were ≤ 2cmH2O for static measurements on controlled ventilation.

Conclusions

Het hele artikel is hier te vinden.